Illustrations of rigid body motion along a separatrix in the case of Euler-Poinsot

  • Semjon F. Adlaj Computing Center of the Federal Research Center “Informatics and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-7836
  • Svetlana A. Berestova Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
  • Natalia E. Misyura Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
  • Evgenii A. Mityushov Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Keywords: Galois axis, synchronous animation, quaternion

Abstract

The aim of our paper is to explain a computer animation of the strictly critical rigid body motion, which ought not be confused with any other motion in its “proximity”, however close. We demonstrate that the (local) “uniqueness theorem” remarkably fails in the case of critical motion which (time) domain must be compactified via adjoining the point at (complex) infinity. Two (opposite to each other) “flips” correspond to one and the same (initial) rotation, exclusively either clockwise or counterclockwise, (strictly) about the intermediate axis of inertia. These two symmetrical reversals of the direction of the intermediate axis (of inertia), initially matching then opposing the direction of the (fixed) angular momentum, share one and the same (symmetry) axis, which we call “Galois axis”. The Galois axis, which is fixed within the body (but coincides with no principal axis of inertia), rotates uniformly in a plane orthogonal to the angular momentum, as our animation demonstrates. The animation also traces the corresponding two (recurrently self-intersecting) herpolhodes, which turn out to be mirror-symmetrical. The “mirror” is exhibited to lie in a plane, orthogonal to Galois axis at the midst of the “flip”. The Galois axis itself is reflected across the minor (or the major) axis of inertia if the direction of the angular momentum is reversed. The formula for the “swing” of the intermediate axis in the plane orthogonal to Galois axis (in body’s frame), turns out to be “a square root” of Abrarov’s critical solution for a simple pendulum, which (imaginary) period is (exactly) calculated.

Author Biographies

Semjon F. Adlaj, Computing Center of the Federal Research Center “Informatics and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences

Scientific Researcher, Section of Stability Theory and Mechanics of Controlled Systems, Division of Complex Physical and Technical Systems Modeling, Computing Center of the Federal Research Center “Informatics and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences; 119333, Russia, Moscow, Vavilov Street 40, semjonadlaj@gmail.com

Svetlana A. Berestova, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Head of the Department of Theoretical Mechanics, Ural Federal University; 620002, Russia, Ekaterinburg, Mira Street 19, s.a.berestova@urfu.ru

Natalia E. Misyura, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Senior Lecturer, Department of Theoretical Mechanics, Ural Federal University; 620002, Russia, Ekaterinburg, Mira Street 19, n_misura@mail.ru

Evgenii A. Mityushov, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Department of Theoretical Mechanics, Ural Federal University; 620002, Russia, Ekaterinburg, Mira Street 19, mityushov-e@mail.ru

References

D. L. Abrarov, Dzeta-model’ klassicheskoi mekhaniki. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty [The Zetamodel of classical mechanics. Theoretical and applied aspects], LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2016. (in Russian).

D. L. Abrarov, “The exact solvability of model problems of classical mechanics in global L-functions and its mechanical and physical meaning,” in Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po matematicheskoi teorii upravleniya i mekhanike. Tezisy dokladov. Suzdal’, Russia, Jul, 7–11, 2017, pp. 149–150.

S. Adlaj, “An analytic unifying formula of oscillatory and rotary motion of a simple pendulum (dedicated to 70th birthday of Jan Jerzy Slawianowski),” in Proc. of Int. Conf. Geometry, Integrability, Mechanics and Quantization, Varna, Bulgaria, Jun. 6–11, 2014, pp. 160–171.

S. Adlaj, “Dzhanibekov’s flipping nut and Feynman’s wobbling plate,” in Polynomial Computer Algebra Int. Conf., St. Petersburg, Russia, Apr. 18–23, 2016, pp. 10–14.

S. Adlaj, “Torque free motion of a rigid body: from Feynman wobbling plate to Dzhanibekov flipping wingnut” in www.ccas.ru, 2017, [Online], Available: http://www.ccas.ru/depart/mechanics/TUMUS/ Adlaj/FRBM.pdf.

A. V. Borisov and I. S. Mamaev, Dinamika tverdogo tela [Rigid body dynamics], Izhevsk, Russia: Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika, 2001 (in Russian).

Yu. F. Golubev, Algebra kvaternionov v kinematike tverdogo tela [Quaternion algebra in rigid body kinematics] (Preprinty PM im. M. V. Keldysha. no. 39), Moscow, Russia, 2013, (in Russian), [Online], Available: http://keldysh.ru/papers/2013/prep2013_39.pdf.

V. F. Zhuravlev and G. M. Rozenblat, Paradoksy, kontrprimery i oshibki v mekhanike [Paradoxes, counterexamples and errors in mechanics], Moscow, Russia, LENAND, 2017, (in Russian).

A. P. Markeev, Teoreticheskaya mekhanika [Analytical mechanics], Izhevsk, Russia: RKhD, 1999 (in Russian).

A. P. Markeev, Dinamika tela, soprikasayushchegosya s tverdoi poverkhnost’yu [Dynamics of a body in ontact with a rigid surface], Moscow, Russia: Nauka,1992, (in Russian).

W. Tong and H. R. Dullin, “A new twisting somersault – 513XD,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2037–2061, 2017; doi: 10.1007/s00332-017-9403-4.

F. L. Chernous’ko, L. D. Akulenko, and D. D. Leshchenko, Evolyutsiya dvizhenii tverdogo tela otnositel’no tsentra mass [Evolution of rigid body motions relative to the center of mass], Moscow–Izhevsk: Izhevskii institut komp’yuternykh issledovanii, 2015.

Published
2018-04-27
How to Cite
Adlaj, S. F., Berestova, S. A., Misyura, N. E., & Mityushov, E. A. (2018). Illustrations of rigid body motion along a separatrix in the case of Euler-Poinsot. Computer Tools in Education, (2), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.32603/2071-2340-2018-2-5-13
Section
Algorithmic mathematics and mathematical modelling