Computational triangulation in the digital age of mathematics teacher education: an example

Keywords: computational triangulation, mathematics teacher education, digital age, square number sieves, Cullen numbers, Wolfram Alpha, Maple, OEIS

Abstract

What is triangulation? Whereas the very idea of triangulation can be traced back to the 6th century B.C. as a method of indirect measurements of distances and heights [1], nowadays, different subject matters use this term when scholarly attempts to make  research rigorous can be described as a construction of a triangle. Most notably, triangulation has been used by sociologists as a way of taking a look at a certain experimental outcome from at least two different perspectives, by connecting three points – the outcome as the focus of research and two alternative perspectives – thus forming a triangle. When there are more than two alternative perspectives, more than one triangle can be constructed. These ideas stem from the works of sociologists [2-6]. In the cited works, different types of triangulation have been considered including methodological triangulation [2], theoretical triangulation [5],  “triangulation between methods and triangulation within a method” [6, p. 217, italics in the original], and triangulation by data sources [5].

Author Biography

Sergei Abramovich, State University of New York at Potsdam

Candidate of Sciences (Phys.-Math.), Professor, School of Education and Professional Studies, State University of New York at Potsdam, United States, abramovs@potsdam.edu

References

Russell, B. A History of Western Philosophy; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 1945.

Campbell, D. T. A Study of Leadership among Submarine Officers; Ohio State University Research Foundation: Columbus, OH, USA, 1953.

Campbell, D. T.; Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56 (2), 81–105.

Webb, E.J.; Campbell, D.T.; Schwartz, R.D.; Sechrest, L. Unobtrusive Measures; Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1966.

Denzin, N. K. The Research Act in Sociology: The Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods; Butterworth: London, UK, 1970.

McFee, G. Triangulation in research: Two confusions. Educational Research, 1992, 34(3), 215–219.

Bowen, M. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice; Jason Aranson: Lanham, MD, USA, 1994.

Abramovich, S. Computational triangulation in mathematics teacher education, MDPI Computation (special issue “Computational social science and complex systems”), 2023, 11(2), 31.

Wing, J. M. Computational thinking. Communications of ACM, 2006, 49(3), 33–35.

Freudenthal, H. Weeding and Sowing, Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1978.

Harrison, J. Formal proof – theory and practice. Notices of American Mathematical Society, 2008, 55(11), 1395–1406.

Abramovich, S. Computational Triangulation in Mathematics Teacher Education; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2025.

Li, Y-L.; Chen, Y-G. On repunit generalized Cullen numbers. Colloquium Mathematicum, 2024, 176(2), 177.

Dewey, J. How We Think; D. C. Heath and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1933.

Published
2025-10-01
How to Cite
Abramovich, S. (2025). Computational triangulation in the digital age of mathematics teacher education: an example. Computer Tools in Education, (3). https://doi.org/10.32603/2071-2340-2025-3-7
Section
Computers in the teaching process